The planet Uranus is a case in point. In his book ‘Prometheus the Awakener’, Richard Tarnas argues that Prometheus better embodies the astrological qualities of the planet we have come to call Uranus. And in ‘The Astrology of Fate’, Liz Greene argues for the mythological Prometheus as a more adequate ruler of Aquarius than Uranus.
And you can see why. Very little is known about the mythological Uranus apart from the fact that he had his children imprisoned in the bowels of the earth because, being earthly, they repelled him; and that one of them, Kronos or Saturn, managed to overthrow him and thrown his severed genitals into the sea, out of which grew the goddess Aphrodite. So this tells us a certain amount about Aquarius, particularly its difficult relationship with the instinctual, bodily realm that it often has to come to terms with. But Prometheus, whose mission was to help mankind, and who brought us all sorts of skills and useful arts such as architecture, mathematics, navigation etc, gives a much fuller picture of Aquarius. There is a lot more mythological material around him. And like Uranus, he also came unstuck through not paying his dues to nature: in Prometheus’ case, he brought fire to mankind against Zeus’ wishes, and he deliberately taunted Zeus, and as punishment for this hubris he found himself strung up in the Caucasus Mountains having his liver pecked out.
So we need to look to Prometheus as ruler of Aquarius to find, amongst other things, that quality of goodwill to humanity, the active desire to help it progress and awaken, that we so regularly find in Aquarius.
Mythologically, both Uranus and Prometheus ended up at war with Saturn, and this perhaps gives us 2 viewpoints on the Saturn-Uranus opposition, which begins in a low-key way this autumn, and then in earnest a year later. Saturn was no better than his father Uranus, for he ate his children, and his son Zeus, aided by Prometheus, in his turn overthrew Saturn.
So Uranus in its archaic form is weaker than Saturn, who overthrows him; but Uranus as Prometheus the Awakener is stronger than Saturn for, along with Zeus, he overthrew Saturn.
So in considering the Uranus-Saturn opposition, in any instance it is maybe interesting to look at whether Saturn is facing up to the archaic Uranus or Uranus the Awakener, because there are likely to be different outcomes. In the first case, as in yesterday’s blog, there is the example of possible US popular protest against the Iraq War this autumn: and here what seems to fit best is Saturn as ordered, civilised society taking steps against the archaic bloodletting that Iraq now is, and Saturn eventually prevailing, in the sense of the US withdrawing from it.
An example of Uranus the Awakener vs Saturn would be scientific progress, where we have form (Saturn) being given to new scientific ideas (Uranus). But it is also the process of new ideas (Uranus) coming into conflict (opposition) with established ways of thinking (Saturn), and in the case of science, Uranus the Awakener eventually tends to prevail over Saturn – or rather, he re-shapes Saturn, so that what was Uranus eventually becomes part of the canon.

14 comments:
Oh! I think I have a Saturn / Uranus / Prometheus whiplash here! I see what you mean... I just wish we could get the mythology straightened out..not such a neat system. Maybe we should take it upon ourselves to rename the planets for our purposes? Don't I wish!
Every time I've seen Saturn / Uranus in opposition in a personal transit it has meant that making needed or wanted changes is very difficult, blocked or even traumatic to a degree. Sometimes the energy gets explosive if the need for change isn't recognized. Uranus to Saturn has resulted in car wrecks, etc. while Saturn to Uranus produced botched system conversions and such.
Although Prometheus is one of my favorite guys I entirely disagree with this rulership of Aquarius idea.
Prometheus is fiery, emotional, involved, caring for man in a different way.
The clue for me is the water bearer image of Aqaurius, which is not the same MO as Prometheus.
The detachment of Uranus fits for me. And I don't think the overthrowing of fathers necessarily indicates weaker or stronger. Just part of the natural progression. They all continue to contribute in some way.
Uranus was also used I believe by Gaia to procreate and was rejected, so this alienation I think is fundamental to Aquarius. Prometheus is a dashing heroic figure, and I don't feel this in Aqaurius.
In some ways, I feel that Aqaurius is being forced to participate with society to balance this tendency to go off to another cosmic place. He never really fits in, and this both disturbs and provides the awakening separation. He is not emotionally invested.
So I think Aquarians are respected and feared, but I have yet to get the connection of fatherhood with us earthlings, beyond the old Saturn connection.
In my experience, however, all my best friends have been Aquarians, and they have been the knowing, odd sort of parental figures in my life. Always in the know.
The Uranus-Saturn opposition will have many effects. The NN will be in Aquarius, favoring the positive side of Uranus, but preparation for Pluto in Capricorn is underway.
Maybe this is a reuniting of the forces as Saturn gets ready to take charge of mundane tasks, and he's meeting with Dad, just as Pluto is meeting with his Dad. All with the Earth as an underlying theme, and what we are going to do for preservation.
I do think an upswing in unity is in the cards for earthlings.
jm, how dare you disagree with me! (joke):)
LOL!!!!!!
See what Saturn-Uranus will do!
I have a Venus-Uranus conjunction so I have an intimate thing going on (as much as one can), and I've tried to be objective and stop loving him, but so far, to no avail.
Saturn-Uranus is separation from authority, finding autonomy, being your own boss. When Uranus opposed my Saturn to the degree, my father died.
In some ways this is encouraging in view of the Capricorn. If some detachment can be established as a prelude, it bodes well for a mature relationship with Saturn as he comes in to govern.
Very interesting sequence. Neptune dissolution, then the Uranian separation. THEN the Plutonian whatever.
A thought on oppositions . . . they can be looked at as complements as the Signs involved are in compatible elements. Why do most astologers want to create an adversarial component? Personally, i find the 150 degree aspect much more difficult to resolve as both the signs & elements involved are quite different in nature.
DR, you wouldn't happen to be an Aquarian by chance, would you?! =smirk=
I'm with JM on the Prometheus rulership of Aquarius, I'm with Uranus all the way. Uranus was horrified was a perfectionist and was willing to sacrifice his children for his ideal view of how humanity should be, very much like Aquarius does.
I think sometimes we limit ourselves by looking at the more obvious elements of an archetype, like Chiron ruling Sag because he was half man half horse (though not really one of the Centaurs), and Ceres ruling Virgo because she is the goddess of grain. We have to look beneath the surface at the underlying psychological forces.
Great articles Dharma!
I am in complete agreement with this, lynn. We do have to look at the underlying psychology. So right. They represent our own psyches, not horses, etc.
I'm not at all pleased with this rush to rulership that seems to be the rage these days, with Pluto stepping down. Most of the connections are far fetched to me, like Prometheus. It's distracting now that real astrology is ready to be practiced. The demand is arriving. Nuts and bolts. Time to get to work. Astrology has changed in a genuine way and it's ready for use.
And you are right about Uranus, and how disturbing his emotional detachment can be sometimes. In some ways I think this is compatible with Saturn, in terms of the upcoming opposition.
All right jm and Lynn, I can't argue with what you say about Uranus ruling Aquarius - except that it pretty much only gives us the bad bits that wouldn't leave anyone in their right mind wanting to be an Aquarian!
What about the generous Aquarian desire to benefit humanity, that I think is deeply felt (and yes, impersonal, but that is also a strength)? And their egalitarian respect for people? It's too fundamental to be left out in the rulership.
Who said Aquarians were in their right minds?????
I find all the rulerships are limited in covering characteristics of the signs. I think they serve best as the symbols to watch movementwise.
Like Pisces. Neptune rules Pisces, and he was baaaaad, with his earthquakes and all. He doesn't personify the compassion of Pisces, when its there. The gentle part.
Mars is Aries, and he was supposed to love bloodshed and uncivilized behavior, but some Aries are spiritual warriors, and don't quarrel.
I think we have to be creative with interpretation of the planetary entities. The other symbols seem to work better, maybe, such as the water bearer for Aquarius, and the way he is depicted as giving this to all equally. I think here is the benefit to humanity.
I also think it's tied up with the oppositions, these characteristics. So the love of Leo becomes love of humanity in Aqaurius.
As an Aquarian, I feel I'd better weigh in here! I take issue with the characterization here of Aquarius as simply 'detached'. It's an oversimplification and I'll have to agree with DR. This idea misses a lot of what Aquarius is all about and what Prometheus stands for which is what DR was tring to say. Prometheus covers quite a lot actually: the rebellious aspect (in defying Zeus), the humanitarian aspect (in compassion for man's suffering, sharing fire), the progressive, innovative aspect as in his role as a 'teacher' sharing useful information and knowledge. He stands apart from the other gods and is unique in that aspect.
I would also argue that Aquarius is perhaps not terribly emotional but can be quite passionate and caring..it's just that it isn't exactly personal but must take group needs into account. And, also, as for the 'natural progression' I would think that this idea favors the overthrow of establishment ideas in order to form a new and more relevant structure for the times..natural evolution.
On the other hand, I do agree that it all isn't that simple with rulerships and that any one symbol cannot cover everything. Also, these symbols can differ in their application depending on whether or not it's being applied on a mundane or personal level.
I suppose I think that a ruler needs to broadly characterise a sign. Which Mars as warrior, for example, does for Aries. The only 3 rulerships that don't seem to me to do this are those for Virgo, Aquarius, and Pisces. As jm rightly says, you can see the humanitarian aspect of Aquarius in the water-bearer, but that's not the same as rulership.
Astrology isn't a science, it's been cobbled together over millenia and IT WORKS, which is what matters. So in a way I'm quite happy to leave it as it is; but I'm not averse either to trying to patch it up a bit.
Nice summary on the role of the 'ruler' :-)
I just can't figure out you nutty Aquarians!
Father of the entire universe and you don't want him????
Pisces makes more sense when i think of the energies of Neptune and Jupiter combined. Isn't Jupiter her traditional ruler?
Aquarius makes more sense when i think of the energies of Uranus and Saturn combined.
No help for Virgo this way, though, until we know her new ruler, to combine it with Mercury.
It makes sense that the later signs would require more complex rulerships, such as two planets at once. The earlier signs are more simple in their energy; hence, our brains can sum them up more easily. Helps on the abstract level of comprehension, but it seems you really need a single ruler to read a chart accurately. Maybe somebody brilliant can do it will all the rulers in mind at all times.
I love this about astrology: I can think it and think it, and eventually i come up against something i'm just not smart enough for. It's delicious because i can taste it a bit but not quite eat it. There's always the feeling of hanging curiosity, the sense that more will be revealed through time and the amazing machine that is formed by the many brilliant minds who ponder astrology and share their thoughts on sites like this. There's always the feeling that we are more together than we could be individually. As we are all living IN our charts, we can each see only a few pieces of the puzzle. We have to communicate and share to make sense of it all. My NN in 8th loves this.
Post a Comment