The crisis in the US banking system, which could still go into meltdown, affects the whole world. It is a global drama, and it is not pre-ordained how it is going to turn out. The US government, with its proposed $700bn buyout of bad banking debts, is doing its best to contain the crisis. But nobody seems to understand the situation. In my last post I quoted George Soros. Today’s financier wearing the dunce cap is Ben Bernanke, Chairman of the US Federal Reserve and one of the people who is central to trying to sort out this crisis. A year or two ago he was saying how inherently great and strong the US financial system is. He used to be a Professor of Economics.
Now if these people were the equally highly trained scientists running the Large Hadron Collider in Switzerland, who are currently trying to sort out a damaging helium leak, it would not occur to me to offer them advice on how to do it, or to think I knew better. But economists are different. They have the highly democratic attribute that however many degrees they have, the man or woman in the street may still know better. Which gives me the right to proffer my opinion. Which I probably would do anyway.When the $700bn buyout was proposed last week, the Sun was in Virgo square to Pluto. So the buyout was based on an analysis (Virgo) in an attempt to regain control (square to Pluto) of the situation. Now the Sun has moved into Libra, and very appropriately for that sign the focus has moved onto the Congressional negotiations over the buyout. It is not just about Libra as negotiator, though. There is a big outcry about fairness, another Libran attribute. Why should these banks be bailed out for their mistakes, and the CEOs walk away with millions, when all these ordinary people are losing their homes as the banks foreclose on them?
As the New York Times wrote today: “The lawmakers objected strenuously to the broad authority Mr. Paulson was requesting, the lack of additional steps to help homeowners avoid foreclosure and the absence of any demands for ownership stakes in the banks that would be helped.”
Fairness was never part of George Bush’s vocabulary, despite having Moon in Libra. This is probably because his Moon is square to his narrow, tribalistic Sun in Cancer. He was quite happy to let New Orleans suffer under Katrina because they were only poor black people, in a way that would never have happened if it had been say Boston. He is wealthy himself, and wants to see the rich getting richer. People who have made a lot of money, far more than they actually need, usually have a mean, selfish streak (which they see as a superior virtue), and George Bush is no exception.
So the $700bn buyout as proposed is entirely in keeping. It is crude, and the banks get away with it at the expense of the ordinary people. And it was put forward in a way that exploits people’s fears: accept this quickly, or the whole financial system and the economy could go down the plug. So it is very heartening to see the strength of the Congressional resistance, from both Democrats and Republicans.
In the UK, the government has rejected calls for curbs on executive pay, while acknowledging the unsatisfactoriness of the situation. If there were curbs in the UK, we would simply lose executives to other countries where there were no such curbs. But the US is big enough to go it alone in this respect, and set the trend for the rest of the world. There seems a good chance such curbs will be set. This will be Pluto in Capricorn at its best.
It is all a sign that the Bush period is passing. But it is more than that. Hard aspects between outer planets usher in new epochs. In 1989, as Uranus approached a conjunction with Neptune, the USSR began to lose control of Eastern Europe. 2 years later, with Uranus and Neptune still not quite conjunct, the USSR itself finally collapsed. Similarly now, with Uranus having been within 8 degrees of a square to Pluto since May, epoch-making events are starting to occur. We are witnessing history.
It is not just about some sort of massive restructuring of the US economy. It is also about America, for now, getting weaker. You can see that in the speech that the President of Iran gave at the UN in New York yesterday, in which he criticised the ‘bullying’ tactics of the ‘occupiers’ in Iraq. Fair point maybe, but the timing says it all. And on the same day, North Korea had the UN seals on its nuclear facilities removed. As America staggers, its enemies are getting bolder. And they’re not wasting any time about it.

4 comments:
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR URGENT BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP
DEAR AMERICAN: I NEED TO ASK YOU TO SUPPORT AN URGENT SECRET BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP WITH A TRANSFER OF FUNDS OF GREAT MAGNITUDE.
I AM MINISTRY OF THE TREASURY OF THE REPUBLIC OF AMERICA. MY COUNTRY HAS HAD CRISIS THAT HAS CAUSED THE NEED FOR LARGE TRANSFER OF FUNDS OF 800 BILLION DOLLARS US. IF YOU WOULD ASSIST ME IN THIS TRANSFER, IT WOULD BE MOST PROFITABLE TO YOU.
I AM WORKING WITH MR. PHIL GRAMM, LOBBYIST FOR UBS, WHO WILL BE MY REPLACEMENT AS MINISTRY OF THE TREASURY IN JANUARY. AS A SENATOR, YOU MAY KNOW HIM AS THE LEADER OF THE AMERICAN BANKING DEREGULATION MOVEMENT IN THE 1990S. THIS TRANSACTIN IS 100% SAFE.
THIS IS A MATTER OF GREAT URGENCY. WE NEED A BLANK CHECK. WE NEED THE FUNDS AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE. WE CANNOT DIRECTLY TRANSFER THESE FUNDS IN THE NAMES OF OUR CLOSE FRIENDS BECAUSE WE ARE CONSTANTLY UNDER SURVEILLANCE. MY FAMILY LAWYER ADVISED ME THAT I SHOULD LOOK FOR A RELIABLE AND TRUSTWORTHY PERSON WHO WILL ACT AS A NEXT OF KIN SO THE FUNDS CAN BE TRANSFERRED.
PLEASE REPLY WITH ALL OF YOUR BANK ACCOUNT, IRA AND COLLEGE FUND ACCOUNT NUMBERS AND THOSE OF YOUR CHILDREN AND GRANDCHILDREN TO WALLSTREETBAILOUT@TREASURY.GOV SO THAT WE MAY TRANSFER YOUR COMMISSION FOR THIS TRANSACTION. AFTER I RECEIVE THAT INFORMATION, I WILL RESPOND WITH DETAILED INFORMATION ABOUT SAFEGUARDS THAT WILL BE USED TO PROTECT THE FUNDS.
YOURS FAITHFULLY MINISTER OF TREASURY PAULSON
Received per email from
http://cmi-gold-silver.com/
Wednesday, September 24, 2008
by Ron Paul
Dear Friends,
Whenever a Great Bipartisan Consensus is announced, and a compliant media assures everyone that the wondrous actions of our wise leaders are being taken for our own good, you can know with absolute certainty that disaster is about to strike.
The events of the past week are no exception.
The bailout package that is about to be rammed down Congress' throat is not just economically foolish. It is downright sinister. It makes a mockery of our Constitution, which our leaders should never again bother pretending is still in effect. It promises the American people a never-ending nightmare of ever-greater debt liabilities they will have to shoulder. Two weeks ago, financial analyst Jim Rogers said the bailout of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac made America more communist than China! "This is welfare for the rich," he said. "This is socialism for the rich. It's bailing out the financiers, the banks, the Wall Streeters."
That describes the current bailout package to a T. And we're being told it's unavoidable.
The claim that the market caused all this is so staggeringly foolish that only politicians and the media could pretend to believe it. But that has become the conventional wisdom, with the desired result that those responsible for the credit bubble and its predictable consequences - predictable, that is, to those who understand sound, Austrian economics - are being let off the hook. The Federal Reserve System is actually positioning itself as the savior, rather than the culprit, in this mess!
* The Treasury Secretary is authorized to purchase up to $700 billion in mortgage-related assets at any one time. That means $700 billion is only the very beginning of what will hit us.
* Financial institutions are "designated as financial agents of the Government." This is the New Deal to end all New Deals.
* Then there's this: "Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency." Translation: the Secretary can buy up whatever junk debt he wants to, burden the American people with it, and be subject to no one in the process.
There goes your country.
Even some so-called free-market economists are calling all this "sadly necessary." Sad, yes. Necessary? Don't make me laugh.
Our one-party system is complicit in yet another crime against the American people. The two major party candidates for president themselves initially indicated their strong support for bailouts of this kind - another example of the big choice we're supposedly presented with this November: yes or yes. Now, with a backlash brewing, they're not quite sure what their views are. A sad display, really.
Although the present bailout package is almost certainly not the end of the political atrocities we'll witness in connection with the crisis, time is short. Congress may vote as soon as tomorrow. With a Rasmussen poll finding support for the bailout at an anemic seven percent, some members of Congress are afraid to vote for it. Call them! Let them hear from you! Tell them you will never vote for anyone who supports this atrocity.
The issue boils down to this: do we care about freedom? Do we care about responsibility and accountability? Do we care that our government and media have been bought and paid for? Do we care that average Americans are about to be looted in order to subsidize the fattest of cats on Wall Street and in government? Do we care?
When the chips are down, will we stand up and fight, even if it means standing up against every stripe of fashionable opinion in politics and the media?
Times like these have a way of telling us what kind of a people we are, and what kind of country we shall be.
http://www.campaignforliberty.com/blog/?p=597
In a single stroke, America has trashed its reputation as a bastion of free-market principles... possibly beyond repair.
It is so bad, in fact, that the finance minister of Italy is making fun of us.
“Greenspan was considered a master,” Italian moneyman Giulio Tremonti says. “Now we must ask ourselves whether he is not, after bin Laden, the man who hurt America the most. … It is clear that what is happening is a disease. It is not the failure of a bank, but the failure of a system.”
http://www.financialsense.com/editorials/litle/2008/0924.html
Post a Comment