Monday, November 24, 2008

Copernicus' Skeleton

3 more days and Pluto will finally leave Sagittarius. So we can expect to see one or two Sagittarian events scooting in before it is too late. Like the remains (Pluto) of the astronomer (Sag) Copernicus being identified in a Polish cathedral where he lived. Copernicus was the supreme Sagittarian, re-visioning our whole sense of our place in the universe, through his theory that the Earth goes round the Sun, rather than the other way round.

Researchers in Poland say they have solved a centuries-old mystery and identified the remains of astronomer Nicolaus Copernicus.

A comparison of DNA from a skeleton in Poland and strands of the astronomer's hair found in a book in Sweden almost certainly confirm it is his skeleton. Archaeologists found the skeleton in north-eastern Poland three years ago in a cathedral where Copernicus lived.

Jerzy Gassowski, the leader of the archaeologists' team, said forensic facial reconstruction of the skull found that it bore a striking resemblance to existing portraits of the father of modern astronomy.’

This theory of Copernicus’ makes the movements of the planets easier to understand. None of us have directly observed the solar system from the point of view of the Sun. But all the same, it has become an absolute truth. Though we have another name, ‘fact’, that conceals this.

As astrologers we are in the odd position of subscribing to this absolute truth, yet pretending it is not the case when we do our astrology, which places the earth at the centre of the solar system. Intellectually, we believe the earth-based system to be nonsense, yet we act as though it isn’t. And then we consider those who ridicule astrology to be closed-minded!

My conviction that astrology is, in a way, nonsense seems to grow on me, but that doesn’t hinder me at all as an astrologer. Because there are all these incompatible forms of astrology that work, I have to treat astrology as a form of divination, like tarot, that works, and which says nothing about our relationship to the real planets and stars. In a way. Because when I look at the Sun and Moon and stars, they have a powerful effect on me, and I know there is something going on. There is no intellectual solution to this conundrum.

Copernicus was born on Feb 19 1473. He was appropriately born with Jupiter in Sagittarius. When he developed his theories, the outer planets had moved into one of those rare configurations where they are all in the waxing phase of their cycles with each other. This only happens about once every 500 years, for about 60 years. It is a time when important new developments happen that define the following 450 years. Like Copernicus’ theory, which changed our relationship to the universe and gave a massive boost to man’s confidence in his own reasoning power - it seemed like a divine gift, and ultimately it ushered in the Scientific Revolution.

We are now, 500 years later, 15 years into another outer planet waxing phase. What is happening in our lifetimes will, on a deep level, define the next 450 years. What a time to be alive! But also, at the time, how hard it is to spot what those seed developments are. But I think the new global connectedness, particularly via the internet, has to be part of that: all we’ve had so far are the early beginnings of it.


Site Meter

5 comments:

Mandy said...

Heh,

I've been interested in astrology for most of my life but in an unsystematic way. I have been using astro.com to look at my chart and those that are close to me and I have to say that my favorite comment is ...'astrology works'. ;) I can pinpoint stuff sometimes so precisely... and then other times...

Darren said...

Not sure if I've misunderstood what you're saying, but I don't think that astrology can't be 'real' because it says that the sun and planets revolve around the Earth. For one thing, its more like an 'operating assumption', which I think is something that physics does a lot in order to make working calculations (ie 'lets *assume* that such-and-such is the case, even though we know it isn't), secondly, astrology seems to be inextricably linked to Human consciousness, and the planets and sun do appear to move around us - so maybe appearances have some kind of important reality? (although maybe thats your point?). Lastly, I think it is possible to do helicentric astrology? (you probably know a lot more about that than me).

Melody said...

Fun discovery! My Mercury / Neptune is a little confused though…are you saying that the Sun as the center of our solar system isn’t necessarily fact? Or are you saying that astrology’s earth centered perspective is incongruent with the fact of the sun being the center? If the latter, what objections would you have to fitting the astrological paradigm into the current and ever evolving quantum physics paradigm, specifically the observer effect and subsequent string theory ideas? I also think that any scientist worth their weight in salt will admit to current scientific paradigms as being little understood and rich mysteries to continue exploring but would never think to call their work nonsense…

fellow astrologer and irrational, arrogant conspiracy theorist ;)

Dharmaruci said...

Putting the Sun at the centre of the solar system seems like a fact, but who has actually seen it? No-one. It's a theory that works very well. We astrologers think of it as a fact, then pretend it is not so when we do astrology. Astrology works, but our theoretical foundations are inconsistent in a not very subtle way. So let's not complain when academics etc rail against it - they have every right to do so.

I think astrology is fundamentally an intuitive/divinatory art, and that has a reality which has little place in our culture and can't be intellectually 'justified' but that doesn't mean it isn't real.

As for quantum physics and the connection between observer and experiment, I think that does bring astrology and science closer, but only in a symbolic sense, which for astrologers is real, but not so for a scientist. So it's a one-sided rapprochement! And same with string theory and its 11 dimensions!

Alaleh said...

intellectually justified?!
how many human activities are actually justifiable? personally i have too many fingers on one hand to count them. i feel compelled to put astrology or any cosmology of our choice way up there : my subjective approach to the intellect!