Thursday, December 03, 2009

Tiger Woods gets caught with his trousers down

The Sun newspaper led today with a picture of Tiger Woods and the quote: “I’ve let my wife down, I’ve let my family down (and I’ve let my trousers down).” The Sun can be appalling as well as having a kind of genius, and it’s certainly not going to put up with hypocritical sentiment of the “I’ve let my wife down” variety. Americans are very good at that sort of hypocrisy, the English not quite so, partly because it is not so bad to have an affair over here, although it’s getting that way: the new Puritanism that has come in the wake of the so-called ‘sexual revolution’, for which I think American feminism is largely to blame.

Anyway, Tiger Woods has been enjoying himself, and he is now claiming to be ashamed of that. He evidently has a taste in models: his wife and 3 mistresses (so far) all look like models, and the trouble is that he is married to one of them. It would be OK if we didn’t happen to live in a monogamous culture (and let’s not absolutise our system), rather than a polygamous or polyandrous one (like Tibet).

The American philosopher William James once had a dream in which the central problem of existence was revealed to him. Waking up, he feverishly wrote it down lest he forget it by the morning. On reading it later, he found he had written:

‘Higamus hogamus, women are monogamous
Hogamus higamus, men are polygamous.’

There you have it!

The first place to look when considering someone’s romantic life is the planet Venus, and Woods has it in Scorpio. Scorpio is, in a way, the most primitive of the signs, or at least the sign that is least ashamed to be ‘primitive’. Scorpio is a sign of desire, of raw desire, and in Woods’ case this does not sit well with his respectable Sun in Capricorn. Hence the hypocrisy. This is also expressed by his Virgo ascendant. Virgo is a sign that is discerning about practical things, and this makes it a sign of ethics. But in their humility and control of their behaviour, a lot can get damned up.


Click to Enlarge

So here we have this controlled, respectable Capricorn with Virgo Rising. And Mars and Venus let him down, which is classic. Wood’s Mars is in two-faced, tricksy Gemini, conjunct the US Mars, so it is a very American sex-story.

And Woods also has Mars conjunct MC opposite Moon conjunct IC. So there is a tension between his public pursuit of sex, and his strong need for a family life. At the same time, his Moon is in expansive Sagittarius, so it is possible that in his heart of hearts he would like to have several wives and families!

Back to Venus in Scorpio. What the women look like is clearly the main factor for Woods, or they wouldn’t all be models. This is the raw, physical desire of Scorpio, and there is nothing ‘wrong’ with that. His Mars, which also describes his desire nature, is in Gemini, and here we see Gemini at its most superficial and glittering.

Both Scorpio and Gemini have a strong relationship with the ‘shadow-side’, that which we would rather not acknowledge about ourselves, that which we are, rightly or wrongly, ashamed of. If you claim to be at ease with your shadow, then that is not your shadow. Scorpio cannot help but be that ‘shadow’, and Scorpio’s path, in a way, is about bringing air and objectivity to it. Gemini, on the other hand, needs to encounter the shadow, to be honest about the murky motives behind the glittering persuasiveness.

Woods’ sexuality seems in a way to be functioning at quite a primitive level. It is a sort of Achilles heel for him. Here is a man at the pinnacle of his society, clean-cut and respectable and respected, but actually it is like Animal Farm where at the end you see the boars in human clothes. He is grabbing the prettiest women (as society sees them) and fucking them, as his high-status allows him to do. I don’t see a moral problem with that in itself, and nor does Scorpio, though not telling the model he happens to have married is, I think, ethically more problematic.

Scorpio, however, is able to function at a deeper level than this. Scorpio is all about depth and intimacy, where the physical looks are increasingly less the issue. Woods’ Venus is at 28.32 Scorpio, and Neptune will be exactly squaring it all of next year. The transit has already begun, and the trouble has begun. Woods will have a different Venus in a year or two. Scorpio is a sign of power, and Woods is using the power that society gives him to pull lots of women. His Venus is (widely) conjunct North Node in Scorpio, so the issue of how he uses power in relationships is very important.

Scorpio is a sign of secrets, and up till now Woods has kept this side of himself out of the public gaze. Neptune has dissolved that secrecy, which means that he won’t be able just to carry on as before. He’ll have to work out what is important to him, for it will destroy his family life, his sense of home and intimacy. At the same time, with his wife seeming to be out of the same stable, so to speak, as his mistresses, that relationship may end also as Neptune does his work.

All this came out when Woods crashed his car into a fire hydrant the other day after an argument with his wife. Uranus was stationing, conjunct his Descendant in Pisces. His Moon (wife) is in fiery Sagittarius, which Uranus has been squaring. So there you have it: the accident (Uranus) involving a fire (Sag Moon) hydrant (Uranus in Pisces)!


Site Meter

43 comments:

Psychic Accordionist said...

I agree with your comment about American hypocrisy regarding sex. We need to get our act together. Here is short a blog post about this very subject.

http://psychicaccordionist.blogspot.com/2009/10/sex-made-you-look.html

starwriterlynn said...

This is a wonderful analysis, D! Glad you are back after a coupla weeks...
BOTH Tiger and his wife Elin are being hit by this rather malefic lunar eclipse on NY Eve. I've observed that eclipses fire up to 3 months before, especially when involved in the luminaries of the chart. This one, is at 10.20 Cancer is opposing her Sun at 10.10 Cap.
She is born Jan 1 1980 and TW born Dec 30 1975. So the eclipse hits the mdpoint between their B-days.

One other BIG thang: She is going thru her first Saturn Return and when Saturn does its last whack at her, it will be exact in May and June of 2010, as TW's Jupiter is sitting plumply on his DSC. Neptune continues to square and dissolve his Venus at that time too.
It will be something to watch if there is a bigger split then.

Sally said...

Interesting comment, Starwriterlynn! I went through my own Saturn Return at the time my own marriage was breaking down. I do not foresee this ending happily for Elin and Tiger!

Anonymous said...

"Both Scorpio and Gemini have a strong relationship with the ‘shadow-side’"

Being a gemini married to a scorpio, I'd love to have you elaborate on this...

Anonymous said...

Damn. Even Swedish supermodels get cheated on.

elsa said...

paging you, DR. See no email link 'round here - I would like you to peek at a chart. :)
Thanks

Anonymous said...

American feminism is to blame for English neo-Puritanism? That's a good one. Only a male chauvinist would write something so ridiculous.

Dharmaruci said...

I think that America, like it or not, has a big influence on world culture.

Anyway, instead of calling me names, perhaps you'd like to present an argument?

Anonymous 2 said...

Yeah, it is really puritanical to dislike behaviors such as lying to your partner and potentially spreading diseases. All due to those nasty feminists! You win the prize for English Chauvinistic Pig Astrologer of the year! How is that for a blanket statement?

Rumpelstiltskin said...

Pay the cowardly anons no mind, Dr. Anon, if you don't at least have the guts to reveal your real name with your insults and fail to actually propose an argument you deserve only to be ignored and dismissed. Either that or comment moderation is in order.

WinkGal said...

Honestly poor Tiger! I mean can you even imagine how many women throw themselves at him every single day?! So it sounds to me that his astrological chart has him set up for wrong doings.

Anonymous said...

Thank you for this post. I enjoyed it very much. Happy holidays wishes to you.

Kenna J said...

I think an element of Woods' motivation is getting forgotten in this conversation, that of extreme competitiveness. I suspect that pursuing supermodels isn't so much about preferring their looks as about feeling competitive with other men. There is an aspect to male sexuality which is naturally competitive. As an example, a friend of a friend ran a singles group for a while. At each event, there were usually two men for each woman attending. You would think, then, that each woman would have a man to talk to. Not so. The men would tacitly agree on who was the most attractive woman in the room, then spend the whole evening trying to get a chance to talk to her. [Hence the term SINGLES group!] I think that Woods' Mars on the MC opposing the Moon on the IC shows how his extreme competitiveness interferes with his personal needs.

I, too, have Mars in Gemini and the Moon in Sagittarius (in the eighth house), and I've always enjoyed exploring nontraditional romantic formats. Woods' Sun in Capricorn and his out-of-control competitiveness (how do you think he got to be the golf pro he is?) makes him need to succeed among the big dogs so badly that I fear he could never allow himself to honestly explore unusual relationship scenarios which would be more true to his nature. I suspect his only hope is his North Node in Scorpio which, if properly embraced, could totally transform him.

And by the way, I think the women Woods tries to seduce are aware that he is married. I mean, I know that he is, and I couldn't care less!

Kenna J said...

I think an element of Woods' motivation is getting forgotten in this conversation, that of extreme competitiveness. I suspect that pursuing supermodels isn't so much about preferring their looks as about feeling competitive with other men. There is an aspect to male sexuality which is naturally competitive. As an example, a friend of a friend ran a singles group for a while. At each event, there were usually two men for each woman attending. You would think, then, that each woman would have a man to talk to. Not so. The men would tacitly agree on who was the most attractive woman in the room, then spend the whole evening trying to get a chance to talk to her. [Hence the term SINGLES group!] I think that Woods' Mars on the MC opposing the Moon on the IC shows how his extreme competitiveness interferes with his personal needs.

I, too, have Mars in Gemini and the Moon in Sagittarius (in the eighth house), and I've always enjoyed exploring nontraditional romantic formats. Woods' Sun in Capricorn and his out-of-control competitiveness (how do you think he got to be the golf pro he is?) makes him need to succeed among the big dogs so badly that I fear he could never allow himself to honestly explore unusual relationship scenarios which would be more true to his nature. I suspect his only hope is his North Node in Scorpio which, if properly embraced, could totally transform him.

And by the way, I think the women Woods tries to seduce are aware that he is married. I mean, I know that he is, and I couldn't care less!

Anonymous said...

Ummmm... I once had a better opinion of Astrotabletalk's Dharmaruci. Now, not so much.

" ... Americans are very good at that sort of hypocrisy, the English not quite so, partly because it is not so bad to have an affair over here, although it’s getting that way: the new Puritanism that has come in the wake of the so-called ‘sexual revolution’, for which I think American feminism is largely to blame. ..."

It's still women's fault for the boyz wandering wee-wees. (By the by, who do gay guys blame?) Will the boyz ever grow up? No.

Anonymous said...

Last comment by joannaoregon. Still haven't the hang of this particular talk board.

Anonymous said...

Puhleeze! No public outrage with British sex scandals/infidelity? What would your politics be without them? Must I list them all? Really now,let's remember Diana and Charles and all the English newspapers sold on the cheating that took place there.And BTW,as for this being so 'American',this is a European-born wife and the mistresses being paid off by British rags for their stories.I think Americans tend to look at the effect marital infidelity has on the children of the marriage.Perhaps you Brits don't understand this,seeing as you pack your kids off at age 7 to be abused and dehumanized by the public school system,not hanging around the home watching Daddy and Mummy boffing the neighbors.

Anonymous said...

"Anyway, instead of calling me names, perhaps you'd like to present an argument?"

I was thinking the same thing about your comment that American Feminism is responsible for a British puritanical backlash. How do you get from the one to the other? There is such a vast array of issues--all of them huge--that account for the differences in male and female sexuality, and that play into social reactions to sexuality, that surely no informed person can think such gross stereotyping says anything important?! Come on, say you're just blowing hot air up our skirts.

Anonymous said...

I'm really sick of women playing the victim, as if they are weaker than men. As if the world is the way it is because of men. As if they can't take any amount of power they want. They can, but they don't. Many women ust rather be the hot chick. I mean, just take a look at "women's" magazines and the content. You can't say it's responsible. When will women (collectively) grow up and take responsibility for their places in the world and for how they wield their sexuality, for the way they consume? It's so easy to take advantage of men sexually, so please quit acting like it's all the man's initiative. Women do this all the time and then cry wolf. Always blame the man is the mantra of many. It takes two to tango. If you want to blame Tiger fine, but why are there always 6 women willing to sleep with a man they know is married, regardless of who initiated it? What does it say about their values? Women's ethics are in the gutter. They do it because they can. BTW, I love and respect women, but the time for honesty is past due.

Dharmaruci said...

Well said above.

And as for further above, I'm thinking of the extreme end of feminism which for a while had currency, the "all men are rapists" type stuff of the 1980s. Male sexuality was judged negatively on quite a broad cultural level, and I think that has contributed to the new Puritanism.

Anonymous said...

I think [female] sexuality has been [forever] "judged negatively on quite a broad cultural level, and I think that has contributed to the new [or any old] Puritanism." ...and you know it, Dharmaruci.

Anonymous said...

Dang again. The above posted by joannaoregon.

Anonymous said...

So I made the original male chauvenist comment and here is my argument. 1) Americans can't help it if the rest of the world has decided to be mesmerized by our culture. Saying that our culture "influences" all of you gives "you" no responsibility for focusing on us so much. Watch your own movies and TV. Unless we produce them and want to sell them to you, we don't care. We're not asking for your attention.

2)SPECIFICALLY blaming American feminism for British "neo-Puritanism" is about as neurotic
(blame via projection)as blaming a woman for being raped because she was so sexy the rapist had no control over himself. If the British think it looks like a good idea to take on "American Feminist values" of relationship honesty and societal fairness to both genders, that's not our "fault." Or is the nation that produced Winston Churchill now just a bunch of mindless sheep who have to do everything we do?

3) To the coward who calls him/herself Rumpelstiltskin, the rest of us cowards who call ourselves the equally opaque name Anonymous, are just too lazy to make up a dumb alias for ourselves.

Rumpelstiltskin said...

Hey Anon, I'm not the one posting anonymous insults. I'm just posting anonymously. There is a big difference. If I'm going to personally insult you, I will use my real name. What are we up to now? 11 women willing to sleep with a married man? But the focus is still on the guy's transgressions. Legions of women sell themselves to the powerful or to anyone with a few dollars and then claim to be objectified or claim to be victims of unwanted attention. Still seems to me that women will choose ass over mind half the time and how is this different than men really? Women use their ass instead of their mind. Men follow ass instead of their mind. It's time to admit that women's behavior and "modus operandi" are fully half of this problem.

Anonymous said...

TaHA! We're up to ONE MARRIED BOY willing to... um, sleep with 11 unmarried women. Seems HIS values are the ones in need of great transformation... as in overhaul of that puritan "ethics." Bah. Humbug. Btw, rumpled... you've told us a great deal already about YOUR values and projections. - joannaoregon

Rumpelstiltskin said...

So the message is for every married man willing to cheat, there are dozens of women willing to drop their pants with FULL knowledge that they are complicit in betraying that man's wife, in breaking apart his family. Yes, that is quite some message.

Anonymous said...

Is that what happened to you, rumple? The onus is on the married guy... he keeps his wee-wee zipped up behind the zipper and there's no problem. That's how an adult would handle it. Counseling could help a couple in distress. - joannaoregon

Rumpelstiltskin said...

Yes, my values are on display.

1) If you are going to personally insult someone, don't be an anonymous coward about it.

2) It's betrayal when men cheat. It's equally betrayal that there is no shortage of women willing to sleep with married men. These women seem to have no ethics and no values. The fact that the emphasis is on the men is a double standard. Why aren't women self reflective about their own comfort with complicity in these betrayals? They are betraying other women and their families. I've even read some popular female astro bloggers who were dating married men. They didn't seem concerned about what they were doing. I'm not talking about people who agree to open relationships, that is another category.

Anonymous said...

Oh. And one other thing, rumple... One absolutely cannot change "The Other" but can only change himself. For that's where his power lays. - joannaoregon

Rum said...

Joanna, so you're saying there is no problem that women are willing to sleep with men they know are married? That they are willing to date such men, pretending that it's all the guy's choice. Every one of those women in my value system is guilty of betraying that man's wife. They are as guilty as he is, and their transgression is equally as great. Society should view it as such. It would be cool if those women had the guts to walk up to Tiger's wife and say "I slept with your husband, there was nothing you could do about it. And I'm glad I did it." Then I could respect them for their honesty.

Kenna J said...

I disagree that the women are as guilty as he is. He is the one who is married.

Kenna said...

Also, regarding this idea that women wield their sexuality and then blame men for it...

I seemed to have no place in this world until I turned fourteen and suddenly had breasts and hips. Suddenly, men were noticing me, giving me things I needed, and wanting to know what I thought about things. I wasn't much different than I had been a year before, yet suddenly I was someone worth paying attention to. Talk about confusing!

As I grew into an adult, I came to have tremendous resentment for my apparent role in the world. Apparently, every single little action I took or word I spoke had sexual overtones. It seemed that everything I did in the presence of a man was interpreted either a sexual advance or a sexual rejection of him. I felt like a gladiator, being forced to constantly have these battles I wasn't interested in. All I wanted was to be a normal human being with a fair chance, but the only value I seemed to have was as a sexual conquest.

Now, at age 35, I have gained some weight, and I can say that my life is SO much better. People who talk to me are actually interested in me as a person, and I'm allowed to display interest in people without their assuming that I'm trying to get them to take me to bed.

If women are angry, it's because there's something terribly wrong with the system, and we can see quite clearly that we are not able to fix it.

I don't know who caused this mess, but the only people who seem to have the power to fix the situation is men. I won't blame men for causing it, but I frequently blame men for not giving a damn enough to try to fix it.

Kenna said...

Please excuse my typos. I published without previewing because my baby had started crying.

Anonymous said...

Rumple's "thinking" is the exact kind of "thinking" that led to the Burning Times with huge political designed implications... in other words, done on purpose by the religiose & govt "authorities" of the time. It appears that those times are never ever over... at least as done by the pinks. - joannaoregon

Anonymous said...

And Pink Boy has been telling that adam n' Eve story forever. TaHA!! "Lookie, Lord (of course it's a "Lord" as only "Lords" give birth donchaknow)... t'wer'nt me that "sinned" but that female you gave me... she did it! And Lil Adam Everyman has been pointing his childish grubby little nail-bitten finger at "his female" ever since. - joannaoregon

Anonymous said...

By the by, "Adam" means "red earth"; "Eve" means Mother of All Living. Chew on that for a while, weeping Rumple. Males don't give birth to anything or anybody & neither do male gods. - joannaoregon

rr said...

You are quite mistaken regarding:
‘Higamus hogamus, women are monogamous --Hogamus higamus, men are polygamous.’ - Please read "When God was a Woman" by Merlin Stone, or The Language of the Goddess: A Conversation with Marija Gimbutas. Could it be that fiery male centered Indo-European marauders from the Russian steppes put an end to a Goddess centered religion and culture that existed for thousands of years? Your little quote is typical male chauvinism: Dear me, women have got men by the balls! Either because they are model sluts, OR because they are puritanical mothers and lest I forget: virgins.

Anonymous said...

Actually,I think it is Mercury conjunct Pluto square Saturn that has us all by the balls on this blog ;)

Anonymous said...

The Boyz World... any of it sound dreadfully familiar? ...bushaholic, cheney-5-deferement, blind-blair? http://medievalhistory.suite101.com/article.cfm/inquisitions_of_the_middle_ages

- joannaoregon

Q said...

Sounds like marriage is ONLY about sex. WTF? I thought there are two children that are a product of this marriage. Children, and a star alpha male athlete's sellable image, which has been turned into major $$. Probably lots of males and females with their hands out there. Lots of males who got some ($) knowing that the image was a fake.

I guess the image was a fabrication, no one's fault for that but the fabricator with the deception and the power. More interesting question would be did he USE his wife to bring in the clean image big bucks?

Q said...

What do you think could have driven him so nuts as to crash his car? Not "love" or marriage - no, - IMAGE and $$. I bet his wife threatened to expose that his clean nice guy image was fake (bye bye endorsements). He has no real marriage, obviously - too bad for the kids. Poor little rich kids. So he has nothing to salvage. So far all he has been trying to salvage is his image. Maybe she really was duped and then found out. Maybe she got tired of hiding her head in the sand and tired of being used as his clean nice family man bullshit money making prop. The children were used as props too. Dude is an athlete tho. The bit about "american feminism" has something to do with this???? -rotflmfao. Look deeper.

Rumpelstiltskin said...

If women are angry, it's because there's something terribly wrong with the system, and we can see quite clearly that we are not able to fix it.

I don't know who caused this mess, but the only people who seem to have the power to fix the situation is men. I won't blame men for causing it, but I frequently blame men for not giving a damn enough to try to fix it.


This is a load of B.S. Women ageed to the social order, women enforce it and women perpetuate it by not exercising their power and\or not exercising it ethically.

As for your experience, I can sympathize, for as a man, I received no attention from women until I made lots of money and then there were no limits to that attention, my marriage not any impediment at all to them. If this isn't the problem, I don't know what is. Women view men as walking bank accounts, or, they view men as wish fulfilling trees. We are supposed to serve their every whim and provide for them. They claim powerlessness, wanting men to be gods that can fix everything and claim only men have power to fix things. Nothing will be fixed as long as this attitude is taken. Only women can fix this problem by claiming their power and stopping the misuse of their sexuality to obtain power, status, and material wealth.

Kenna J said...

Rumplestitskin: The one place where we women cannot exert influence is groups of men where no women are present. If you're going to blame women for not doing their part, then you'd better take responsibility for doing your part every time you are in a situation where there are no women. Do not let a single misogynist comment go by without protesting. Not one!

And yes, I practice the same policy when I'm in a group of women only. I never let a woman say something derogatory about men without interjecting (or about women, for that matter). And I never, ever use sexist epithets.

If you genuinely care about this problem, read The Gender Knot by Allan G. Johnson.