The Uranus
opposition, which usually occurs aged 40-42, is known astrologically as the Mid-life crisis. I wrote
about this a year ago, but I’m not even going to read it, or I’ll just
think I’m repeating myself and grind to a halt.
I think the Uranus
opposition gets singled out because its effects around that age are often the most
dramatic and evident. Uranus transits tend to be more observable because of
their sudden and disruptive nature.
But all the
planets from Saturn outwards complete a part-cycle in the first half of our
forties: Saturn opposite Saturn, Uranus opposite Uranus, Neptune square Neptune
and Pluto square Pluto. (My Pluto square was in my late 30s due to his
eccentric orbit.)
So all the transformational planets are hard at work on us over a period of years, often leading to a prolonged period of soul-searching and not knowing what your life is about anymore. That’s maybe not so familiar to us at that age, and it’s not what the world wants of us, so you can end up judging yourself negatively as a mess, a failure, an underachiever. Instead of going wow, I’m turning into a philosopher!
Each of the
outer planets is wanting us to deepen in different ways: Pluto wants us to claim
a power, a confidence, that stands alone; Neptune wants us to re-imagine and
de-literalise our conception of our lives; Uranus wants us to slough off
received opinion and find that which is uniquely our own; and Saturn guides our
new self into the world, helps us live the beginnings of wisdom that,
hopefully, are emerging.
All these
processes intermingle, they need each other: how can you have the confidence to
live your originality (Uranus) without Pluto behind you?
_________________________________
Ad Break: I offer webcam astrology
readings (£20 per ½ hour). Contact: Dharmaruci71(at)hotmail.com. I’ll also travel across the world to do
readings, talks, classes – make me an offer! _________________________________
The spark
for this piece was the idea of the Uranian move from received opinion to
something which is truly our own. I think that is a crucial axis, it is
something completely new coming into our lives, a new kind of quality, a real
foundation on which to build.
This is, of
course, schematic. Some people might be initiated by life much earlier, others
continue to be (unconscious) followers all their lives, apparently barely
responding to the influence of the outer planets.
But that
finding of something which is truly your own. That seems to me to be the
essence of the ‘mid-life crisis’ from a Uranian point of view. Of course it may
not be a crisis. It may just be a natural unfoldment. But all the same, Uranus is
the planet of individuality, of our uniqueness.
Which is my take on why
it rules astrology: the chart describes the particular and unique way that each
of us is made, it shows that we are essentially anything but herd members,
albeit having profound links to the collective. It is also said that Uranus rules astrology in our age because it
is disreputable, it is charlatanry, it is outside the norm. But I think the basis of astrology is Neptune,
it is this collection of gods and goddesses and archetypal forces whose
influence on our individual lives we divine.
Everybody
thinks they are leading their own lives, and are offended if you suggest
otherwise. Capricorns are perhaps the sign where it can be most obvious that they
are not. More than any other sign, Capricorn tends to live out the imprint the
parents have made. You can see them leading one or the other of their parents’
lives, sometimes in ridiculous detail. This is because Capricorn is a sign of respect
for authority and rules and rising up the hierarchy. It is easy
for me as an Aquarian to laugh at that, but through this Capricorns can build
up a solid foundation in themselves out of which their own contribution can eventually
emerge. Whereas Aquarians, original as they may be, can find it hard to land on
the planet, to create a life that works.
So you can
see these Capricorn types, maybe very capable, very motivated, very successful,
priding themselves on their achievements. But there may be nothing original
there, nothing they have brought to the table that has not been brought 1000
times before. But they don’t think like that.
And you can
see it with astrologers. They may be very good astrologers, very helpful to
people at reading charts, they may even have written a book or two. But what
they say doesn’t grab you, like where did that come from?
Again, I’m
not criticising. It is a natural process that I am talking about, that the
Uranus Opposition describes. It’s like we’ve learnt the ropes, we’ve mastered
our craft, and that often needs to come first, and that can take most of our
thirties (after, schematically, buckling down at our Saturn return when we are
30.)
So Uranus
comes along and starts to break down this maybe substantial but limited sense
of self that we have created. Something new is trying to break in. Uranus is
essentially a creative planet, he is the divine spark that creates new life.
And that can be very disruptive. All aspects of our life can start to seem
limited, the product of a previous, more narrow self. It can be messy, but
there’s no law saying that change isn’t messy. But one way or another, that new
self has to be allowed to live. It’s a kind of law of life, and in a way it’s
not for us to judge that the consequences would be too awful and messy and
unthinkable to follow through. We are simply creatures of life, and if we have
sense then we follow life to the next stage.
It reminds
me of what Jung said about death, that the unconscious (another word for life
itself) does not behave as though death is an extinction, so it is therefore
best to live like that, to remain alive and open as we age. The point being
that we need to live according to how life is. And in the case of the Uranus Opposition
or any major transit, to make the changes that life demands of us so it can
move on.
And what comes
out the other side has the flavour of authenticity, of someone who knows what
they are talking about on a deep level, a gut level, an existential level, if
you like. Or someone who is capable of sometimes being like that: what is
planted is a seed that has to be grown.
It is a new
kind of knowledge, something you haven’t read about in a book. And you can feel
when someone is coming from that. It’s not something you can prove. One person
may be able, for example, to talk astrology brilliantly and humorously and
entertainingly, and another may not have much to say at all, but what they do
say rings true on a human level, it’s like there is earth in it, they have seen
it for themselves. And the first person may not have that quality, for all their
brilliance.
And that is
the kind of difference the Uranus Opposition can bring, that is the essential
point I wanted to make in this piece. This sense of authenticity, of reality
that comes with something that is truly your own. It probably also needs a
hefty dose of Neptune and Pluto, but Uranus is the spark of something new, life
as a process of always creating something new that you could never have thought
of beforehand.
It is like,
schematically, we spend our 20s and 30s living the life that has been dreamed
for us. It is natural for parents to do this around their children, they can
hardly help it, it is probably not even conscious. And it gives roots to the
child, a sense there is a place for them in the world. But if that dreaming is
too rigid, then there are no wings, just roots, and roots on their own
suffocate.
It is not
just our parents who have dreamed our life for us. Society has too, and again
that can create a place for us, but it can also suffocate. But I think it is
wrong-headed to protest against this natural process and call it ‘brainwashing’.
It is rigidity that is the problem, it is rigidity that is the problem in any
walk of life. There is nothing wrong, for example, with religion in itself, it
is the rigidity you often find that is the problem, the sense that things have to
be one way and one way only.
And this is
perhaps why the Uranus Opposition can be so disruptive. Not because it is
bringing something of one’s unique self into a received way of living and
thinking, but because there is also rigidity there, the sense that one has to
live and think a particular way or else life will turn to poo, one will be a
loser and a failure and a bad lot and shameful. That rigidity may have been
bred into us, or we may have contributed it all on our own!
But one
thing I think we learn from astrology readings and from listening to people’s
lives is not to judge, or at least not too quickly or narrowly. What society
may see is someone giving up a high-flying job to work in MacDonalds (as in
American Beauty, a Uranus Opp must-see*) and bringing a ‘lower’ standard of
living to his family. Bad person, irresponsible, loser, he’s lost it. That is
the sort of quick and automatic judgement that conventional thinking brings, along
with a secret dose of schadenfreude, of rejoicing in another’s misfortune. This
is normality, how ‘normal’ people think.
But what the
astrologer sees is maybe the Uranus Opposition, this force that is bigger than
conventional values, that is much more real and that doesn’t care about highly-paid
jobs for their own sakes. What we may see is, in a way, the opposite of the
conventional viewpoint that only looks at what is apparent. We look at what is
underneath, what is real. What we may see is someone who is prepared to risk
his career and job security and the good opinion of others to create deeper
meaning in his or her life, who is questioning the received values around him,
who is going through a lot of conflict and soul-searching as a result.
And creating
something that has a kind of imperative around it because it touches on
something real, that cannot be measured in terms of salary and respectability:
if that small pot has to be broken, then so be it. What can look like loserdom,
a diminution from a conventional point of view, can in reality be an
augmentation, a heightening of life; what is actually happening is that the
roots are breaking the pot that has become too small. But it can take a while
to realise this, you sometimes have to upend all those things and people you’ve
looked up to and understand that you see things that they don’t and it’s time
to move on.
* The Middle Passage by James Hollis is a good Jungian read on all this.