I’ve sort of wondered recently, do I have a particular
approach to astrology? I probably do, it’s just that I haven’t tied it into a
bundle and called it something. I’m not sure I’d want to, because for me what
is important is the astrologer hirself (pronounced with a Scottish accent), not
the set of ideas around them. It seems to be a well-trodden path to
establishing yourself as an astrologer that you need a book and a specialty,
and that is what you are known for. Up to a point, that seems fair enough. But
also, people can look really good on paper, and become well known and
respected, without being that substantial as people. This idea gets raised a
lot in Buddhism, where you have the famous teacher who knows everything there
is to know and can argue and present brilliantly, but the guy with the real
insight is the cowherd that nobody looks twice at.
For me, it’s the person that matters, and that applies right
across all the counselling/ healing/’spiritual’ fields. I think astrology, because it is a craft based on such a multitude of
ideas, is particularly prone to identifying substance with intellectual
attainment. The well-known names in astrology are often not particularly
known for their ability to read personal charts. They may be perfectly good at
that, but it also seems to be an increasingly well-trodden path to stop doing much
in the way of personal charts and to enter the academic world. Astrology has an
issue with intellectual credibility, and the more it allows itself to feel
wrong-footed by the establishment, and desperate to prove itself in their eyes,
the more one-sidedly intellectual it is liable to become.
Because surely this is
what astrology comes down to, the ability to sit down with someone and be of
real help to them. And that is not just about the ability to read charts. More
importantly, it is the ability to identify what the important issues are for
someone that will help them move on, and to have sound, uncommon sense things
to say about those issues. And this comes back to where you are as a human
being. Have you had that initiation by life that allows you to see beneath the
conventional surface to what is real? Is what you know really your own, is it
lived? In astrological terms, have you allowed Neptune and Pluto to madden you
and tear you apart, and have you seen what they were getting at? You may be 20
years old and have understood that, you may be 80 and still taking the world at
face-value.
But coming back to where I started. Do I have a particular
approach? Well I’m thinking it could be called polytheistic astrology. The
planets as gods. Not planets as principles or even archetypes but as actual
gods who have claims upon you. Gods whose presence you sometimes feel. Those
‘parts of the psyche’ that they represent are in a sense independent of you,
not located purely ‘within’ you. The psyche as an objective reality, as Jung
put it. As James Hillman said, the soul has become located within the person and
not in the world, which is why he thinks psychotherapy has not helped make the
world a better place.
________________________________________________
Ad Break: I offer webcam astrology readings
(£20 per ½ hour). Contact: Dharmaruci71(at)hotmail.com. I’ll be travelling in Canada and the USA this year doing readings and
informal talks – if you’d like me to drop by, let me know!_________________________________
Astrology has a particular offering to the modern world in
this sense, because it sees the synchronicity between inner and outer events.
It sees, in other words, that the soul is in the world ‘out there’, that inner
and outer are not separate, that there is an underlying unity.
And the gods also straddle this modern divide. If you have
say Mercury square Mars in your chart, you could see it as a challenge to be
bold in your thinking and speech; and if you are not bold, well maybe it’s
going to come out some other way, maybe you’ll find yourself swearing aggressively
at people. But also you could see it as the gods Mercury and Mars ‘out there’
making claims upon you that are conflicting because they are in incompatible
elements, say Fire and Earth. And maybe the way to move it on is by
propitiating them. You do ceremonies, build altars to them and their elements,
invoke them and honour them.
Often we use astrology as a psychoanalytic tool,
and that’s well and good. But maybe we don’t need that analysis of how ‘our’
personality works. Because it’s not ‘ours’ anyway. You belong to the gods, not
the other way round. If we honour Mercury and Mars, and let them know we want
them to work together, then we can leave it to them to sort that out. They are
much bigger and more powerful than us, it is in a sense not our place to try
and sort them out. And what they might have in mind when it comes to working
well together might be quite different to what we have in mind. It might
involve some sort of deal. They might think it’s perfectly OK to swear and
curse sometimes. The gods are not moral in a conventional sense.
I’m not claiming originality for this approach. It’s just
what I lean towards. 3 years ago, in the middle of a series of Neptune
transits, I felt I needed more vision in my life. So I drove off and did a
ritual to Neptune that involved both the beach and a forest. 2 weeks later, to
my surprise, I found myself getting ready to move house, setting in motion a
chain of events that is still unfolding.
Astrology shows us that there is this much bigger
understanding, bigger picture that is beyond our limited human grasp. It may not matter that much whether we
understand ourselves in a psychological sense. People got on for thousands
of years without modern psychology. What does matter is the understanding that
there are these larger forces – which as an astrologer I identify with the
Greek gods – and that our job is to feel them and honour them and live by them.
That is the beginning of wisdom. Our
life is not ‘our own’, we cannot dream up whatever we want and then ‘empower’
ourselves to have it. That is wrong-headed. As Jung said, Free Will is about doing
gladly what we have to do.
So I’m a polytheistic astrologer. I think I’m probably also
an evolutionary astrologer, but not in the sense that is normally understood: From Wiki “An evolutionary astrologer works from the
belief that souls reincarnate and evolve over many lifetimes and are therefore
born with pre-existing experiences and orientations that affect the soul's
current incarnation. In the evolutionary astrology paradigm, the natal chart is
believed to show the soul’s intent, the life lessons of a person's present
life, and to give insight into lessons and learnings of past incarnations. In
the evolutionary astrology paradigm, the natal chart is believed to show the
soul’s intent, the life lessons of a person's present life, and to give insight
into lessons and learnings of past incarnations. ”
I only do past lives on Tuesdays and Thursdays. My point
being that I don’t do belief if I can help it, in the sense of basing my
thinking on ideas I cannot verify for myself. I can read evidence for past
lives, but I have no experience of them. Nor am I aware of ‘pre-existing
experiences’. Of course, we have an innate character that is not just the
product of our parents and surroundings, that is observable, but you don’t need
to invoke past lives to explain that – indeed, why explain it at all? I don’t
mind past lives as a story we sometimes tell ourselves, but we need to dance
lightly with it, not take it too literally.
I mean, the world we actually experience is not literally
there, it is a product of the brain and an artificial separation into inner and
outer, subject and object. So a fortiori
I don’t think we can take something we do not generally experience, i.e. past
lives, literally. And even more so the lessons we are supposed to have learnt
in those past lives.
And the idea of a soul intent I can’t really buy either. I
can buy the gods’ intentions, I’m happy with that. But I’ll leave that to them,
it’s not for me to poke around there, like trying to open a flower bud before
it’s ready. Besides, they might change their minds!
I’m evolutionary in the sense that I have observed that life
is always moving on to some new stage. This is Pluto. You see it in plants and
animals, not just in the course of their individual lives, but in the way
species change over long time periods, and the way life seems to bring in new
elements: that is Uranus. And you see it in people, in our own lives and in
others’ lives. And usually I see my job as an astrologer as identifying how
people’s lives are trying to move on (yes, it’s life, not them, that provides
the impulse) and take the side of that bit that wants to move on. That is the
main thing, everything else follows from that. If you answer that call to
change, to become someone in a way more than you were (which often involves
becoming less, stripping away the old), then you are doing that life needs of
you. That is often a very hard thing for people to do, and some people move
faster than others, some barely at all in the course of their lives. But I
think most personal difficulties in a way come down to this. Are you prepared
to change in the way that life is asking you to? And as an astrologer I can
have a good idea of what way that is, that is where I can be of help.
So I am an evolutionary astrologer in the sense that my
experience is that life is always moving on to a new stage in its own
mysterious way, and my main job when I read a chart is to identify and back
that process.
So there you have it: I’m a polytheistic evolutionary
astrologer.