In my last
piece I said that I put shamanism - or it put itself - on a back burner in the early noughties. That
was true inasmuch as I stopped doing stuff and ran with astrology instead.
But not true inasmuch as I was around someone doing it, though the guy
concerned would not have used the word 'shamanism'.
We moved
into a new house in Glastonbury in 2001, and I had the wish that a Native
American teacher would turn up. And turn up he did, a few months later. A
friend had rung saying there was this guy over from Canada who was a
story-teller, teacher etc and was looking for places to run events from, so we
said yes. And for the next 8 years or so Chip (as I shall call him) and/or Fish
(his pupil) visited twice a year and did story-telling, teaching, sweat-lodges,
pipe-ceremonies and individual counselling and healing. As well as some great
conversation round the table.
So why did
he turn up in the first place? Was it just because I wanted him to? I'm sure
the bigger picture was playing its part, and there's nothing I can say about
that. And I like sensing that dimension - which is most of everything - about
which I have nothing to say, and never will. As Chip used to say (speaking from
the Chippewa-Cree tradition), our individual human consciousness is tiny
compared to the consciousness of the universe, so how can we individually know
more than a miniscule amount about the universe?
That just
seems to me so sane compared to the modern attitude, inflated by technological
success, that sets human consciousness at the pinnacle of knowledge.
So yes, the
bigger picture played its part. But I'd also wished he'd turn up. And looking
back, it was a wish in the form of a prayer, though I didn't put it to myself
like that, and that is also why Chip turned up.
It wasn't
just a fancy, it was more of a desire that had a depth and sense of congruence
to it, it felt right. And I think that is how prayers work, as in what we do in
pipe ceremonies and sweat lodges and wherever else. There needs to be deep
feeling involved that is beyond narrow personal desire. If you like, there
needs to be a transpersonal element that connects to the wider web of
all-that-is. And that gives it power. And it does not need to be 'realistic':
that can just get in the way. A prayer is what comes out of our mouths
spontaneously and in a heartfelt way. Who are we to say what is and is not
possible? Spirit is beyond time and space: shunting things around on the
physical level is the least of its problems. Getting us intransigent humans to
look at ourselves and act in what is our own best interests is the really
difficult problem!
Some people
say don't think about your prayers in advance, because they need to be
spontaneous. Personally I say dwell on them, think on what you really want for
yourself and for others, and those wishes will grow inside you, so that when
you are in the ceremony your words will have more power. And when your words
have that power, how can there NOT be a response? When we feel something
deeply, it connects us to the universe.
But we also
need to be open to what that response might be. I know someone who used to
treat her prayers like a shopping list, and say them in the full confidence
that she would get exactly what she asked for, and as far as I could see, she
rarely if ever got that. We may be specific in our prayers, and I think we need
to be specific. And then open to the outcome, to the response, because there is
something that knows more than we do that is responding.
No comments:
Post a Comment