I've
just watched a great documentary series on netflix: Wild, Wild Country.
It is the story of Rajneesh and his followers in Oregon in the 80s. A
cult that went wrong, bigtime. They created a city in the wilderness,
took over the local town, and ended up with a huge arsenal of weaponry;
there were also incidents of poisoning and attempted murder against
their enemies. Of which there were plenty. They attracted huge national
opposition.
Fundamental
to this story is the propensity that I think we all have, or have had,
to idealise teachers. There is plenty of it in the shamanic world. And I
think it is normal to do so. We come staggering along, maybe confident
and competent in a worldly sense, but with little idea of who we are on a
deeper level. That is not something we are taught :) And so we project
all that good stuff onto a teacher. I think it is a natural process. A
good teacher does not need those projections, and does not create a
2-way street, a kind of love-in if you like, with the pupil. All
teachers will claim they don't want followers, but it can be hard to
resist the flattery of people thinking you have the answers. I think
it's very difficult for a teacher not to slide into this one, at least
some of the time.
 |
| THE 'LOVE-IN' |
--------------------
I offer skype/FB video astrology
readings, by donation. Contact: BWGoddard1
(at)aol.co.uk
---------------------
And
I think a crucial point is finding that guide within ourselves. As I
say, it is natural and necessary to seek it outside ourselves to start
with. But then we have "If you meet the Buddha on the road, kill him!" A
friend was telling me how at a certain point in his life his spirit
guides, who had always been there for him, refused to help, that there
was an important decision he had to make on his own.
In
my 20s and 30s I was around a Buddhist set-up, and all it was about
fundamentally was me finding what I call my 'metaphysical autonomy'.
Once that happened - and it was like a deep eruption after many years
preparation - it was all over, and I was on my shamanic way :)
One
of the main people they interviewed for the Rajneesh series was the guy
who had been their lawyer. He must be about 70, and 'the Bhagwan' is
long dead. But this guy is still under the spell. He still describes
'the Bhagwan' as 'the master of masters' - like, how can you know that?
Another person they interviewed, who went to jail for attempted murder,
has broken the spell, but it took many years. This process can take a
long time, and it may never happen in someone's lifetime. And it may be
incremental. Few people can admit to giving power away to a teacher; we
think we are autonomous when we are not. It is seen as 'faith' to put
the teacher's judgement before one's own, and arrogance to do otherwise.
And
it is about knowing that we have all the guidance we need within. It is
not something we can will into being, and it is easy to kid ourselves.
It is a profound psycho-spiritual event that is like finding gold. And
even then we can dip in and out of it. The path then becomes about
allowing the gold to take root, to permeate our being.
It
also then becomes possible to know the shadow. With the Rajneeshis, all
goodness was projected onto 'the Bhagwan', and all evil was projected
onto those who opposed them. This is no different to Nazi Germany, where
Hitler carried the ideals, and the Jews carried the shadow. And the
Bhagwan was also divided in this way: when his senior disciple left, he
publicly rounded on her and denounced her. She was now the enemy. It was
immediate.
 |
| From The English Magic Tarot Deck |
And
I think it works something like this: when you live from your inner
sense of guidance, you have all you need. You're not needing to prove
anything to the world or to other people. Or at least, not to the same
degree. So we become able to admit to our own weaknesses and
vulnerabilities, because doing so does not take anything away from who we are. In fact, there is a sense of it adding to who we are, but not in an ego sense.
The worldly path involves building a sense of ego, and this is seen as normal. It is why we admire people who are rich or famous or royal. Admit it: if a celebrity walked into the room, you'd feel differently to if a regular guy walked in. I know I would. And this way of seeing the world is often carried over into the 'spiritual' world, where people want to become a 'name'. It is certainly true of the shamanic world, where it has in places become normalised.
But it's all just vanity, and misses the point. When
a Chippewa Cree teacher used to come and stay with me and run events,
he refused this sort of self-promotion. He would limit himself to a
factual description of his background and training, and didn't want
himself put out on the internet. I can go with that. And the people
still came.
--------------------
I offer skype/FB video astrology
readings, by donation. Contact: BWGoddard1
(at)aol.co.uk
---------------------
No comments:
Post a Comment