(Also published at my other blog www.shamanicfreestate.blogspot.com) In the early 80s, after university, I decided to live in
a Buddhist community. This was a great disappointment to my father, who had
assumed I would have a stellar career that he could be proud of. On
one visit
back home, he got a bee in his bonnet about what Buddhists ‘do’. I didn’t
really have an answer, as it hadn’t occurred to me to think like that. And the
more I couldn’t answer him, the more incensed he got, because for him it was a
simple matter, with what should be a simple answer. He kept repeating along the
lines of well plumbers fix pipes, poets write poetry, what do Buddhists do? I tried saying stuff about meditation
and ethics and enlightenment and all that, but it was nothing he could
understand in terms of doing. I was,
as it happens, working in a Buddhist vegetarian restaurant, but that, of
course, wasn’t a general activity of Buddhists that I could invoke.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a57b2/a57b250af9bc051388664b850332b615132b1413" alt="" |
Black Elk |
Buddhism, like any spiritual path, is essentially an
attitude to life, on the basis of which the ‘doing’ happens. For us shamanistas,
this attitude is well-expressed by Black Elk:
“Hear me, four quarters of the world - a relative I
am! Give me the strength to walk the soft earth, a relative to all that is!
Give me the eyes to see and the strength to understand, that I may be like you.
With your power only can I face the winds.
Great Spirit, Great Spirit, my Grandfather, all over
the earth the faces of living things are all alike. With tenderness have these
come up out of the ground. Look upon these faces of children without number and
with children in their arms, that they may face the winds and walk the good
road to the day of quiet.
This is my prayer; hear me! The voice I have sent is
weak, yet with earnestness I have sent it. Hear me!”
I haven’t found this attitude so fully expressed anywhere
else but in what we in the West have come to term ‘shamanism’. Attitude is the
wrong word, because it is not something added on. It is a way of being, a
beautiful and loving way to relate to the earth, that is also true and real. It
is based on how things are. And in bringing humans ‘down’, as we might see it,
to the level of the elements and other forms of life, it elevates us, it shows
us how to be noble human beings.
And for me, this is the essence of shamanism.
The Wikipedia definition reads: “Shamanism is a
practice that involves a practitioner reaching altered states of consciousness
in order to perceive and interact with a spirit world and channel these
transcendental energies into this world.”
This is a definition in terms of doing rather than being,
and it is typical of us westerners to come up with such a definition. It is
like saying a Christian is someone who performs miracles. OK, technically the
shaman is a special type of person who can do the healing stuff, or rather his
spirits can. But shamanism has come to mean our western re-interpretation of
indigenous spirituality: the healing work is just a special instance of that
broader engagement. And for the traditional shaman him/herself, the healing
work takes place in the prior context of this sacred but natural connection to
the world, without which the healing would be unthinkable.
So I think that shamanism is not to do with whether
you can do healing work or lead ceremonies. Shamanism is a context, a context
of profound gratitude and relatedness to the natural world. These days, the
world is something we take from. But the traditional (and more adult) attitude is that it gives
to us. That is the basis. And it’s not the natural world in just the modern,
material sense: it is that, but more, it gives us the power to live, and it is
the spirit world. Spirit and matter are the 2 poles of life, inner and outer,
if you like.
But it is hard to get away from doing definitions. Maybe it always has been. Material existence
presses hard upon us, it can seem like it is all there is. One of the main functions
of the shaman is simply to remind people about spirit. In my mid-30s I realised that
the power to live was not a given, it was something that could be taken away
from me. And it had been taken away from me because I had not listened to the
call of my spirit. It was a deep turning around for me, my eyes turned inward
to a place that was alive and beyond any words or dogma. And at that point I had
very little definition of myself in terms of doing. I was being dragged through a deep lesson in being.
So it is this way of being, which is sometimes just an
attitude because it’s the best we can do, that matters. That sense of profound
connection to the natural world, for me, is occasional, if at all. I enjoy the
natural beauty of the beech trees outside my caravan, and I enjoy watching the
sheep eat, and sometimes my breath is taken away by the sight of the horses in
the field beyond. But when I read other people writing about the importance of
feeling our identity with the natural world, I easily feel wrong-footed, like I
only have a faint glimpse of it. I also feel wrong-footed when people write
(usually in their intros to their healing services) about how they’ve been
seers, or something like that, since childhood. I know I certainly wasn’t. (Though
I confess I’m slightly suspicious when people do that.) And then of course
there are indigenous people, and I’m certainly not the real thing in comparison
to them. Maybe I’m just human, and need to forgive myself, and remember that others
probably feel, and have always felt, the same way.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa2bd/fa2bd3fc557a2ea45be3b713a3cef420dfda2f6a" alt="" |
Protestant Work Ethic |
But
the main point here is that more than ever, we
live in a 'doing' culture, and we easily define shamanism in those
terms, and
when we do that we have missed the point. The term 'shamanic
practitioner' seems to me to carry some of this bias. 'Doing' is easily
the enemy of being,
as it devalues being, says that if I can’t measure you, then you are
nothing. Astrologically,
I call it the western negative Saturn (see my astrology blog). It’s deeply rooted in western culture, I
don’t think we can help but do it. It’s a dark spirit we carry with us. Being
able to take a holiday from it sometimes is itself an achievement.
What
matters is the sense of appreciative connection, firstly to ourselves and then to the natural world and its people and to
that thing beyond, however we experience it. If a calling to do healing work,
or whatever, comes in as well, let it come to you, don’t seek it out. I don’t
think it likes being a day-job.
1 comment:
Thank you. This speaks to me more than anything i've read for a very long time.
Post a Comment